Skip to main content

PSA testing for Prostate Cancer Screening

Turn your head and cough, but also keep your pants on

In the ever-changing world of prostate cancer screening, there's been a recent new development I just did a talk on that I thought was interesting.  As recently as last week, there was a New York Times article Debating the Value of PSA Prostate Screening so just a few salient points:

- The PSA test, initially developed to monitor for prostate cancer RECURRENCE, was then used to screen for prostate cancer before we really understood how to use it, which led to many years of procedures and treatments that we now think were likely not helpful in keeping people from dying from prostate cancer.

- NOW, there is no real right answer.  Prostate cancer screening MAY save lives for some very high risk people (African-Americans and men with BRCA 1 or 2 mutations), but having a family history of it is less understood, mainly because of how many people were over-diagnosed and over-treated.  If your dad had prostate cancer that went elsewhere in his body, that's important as that's an advanced stage cancer, but for a lot of the other types, it's not clear how much of a genetic risk there is.

- The US Preventative Services Task Force and the American Urological Association agree that men should think about screening between ages 55-69, and most health insurances generally go with the USPSTF.  Any society that has the word "cancer" in it, recommends earlier screening for basically every cancer there is, though most people agree its really trying to identify people at the highest risk, which is still tough to do with our current knowledge.

- An addition to our knowledge was a recent article saying that if your first PSA is 2 or higher at age 55, and especially if it's over 4, your risk of significant prostate cancer down the road is higher.  On the other hand, if the PSA is under 1 when first checked, your risks of getting prostate cancer are very low.  Of note, the PSA test ain't perfect either as you can have high levels and no disease and normal levels and major cancer, though those are usually the exceptions and not the rule.  They are still working on better ways of testing and sometimes they are doing MRI's instead of biopsies after a PSA is elevated so it's an ever-evolving field.

- The changes in guideline recommendations over the last decade have led to a slight increase in the incidence of advanced stage prostate cancer, possibly due to reduced earlier screening, but they are still at their lowest level in decades.  Importantly, African-American men now have their lowest incidence of prostate cancer deaths ever, but still much higher than everyone else.

- Most people now agree a digital rectal exam is pretty worthless for screening prostate cancer as it usually ends up being a coin flip as to how helpful it is in finding cancer (meaning half the time when we find something, it's not cancer, and half the time we don't find something, people can have cancer) and if that's the case, you might as well just flip the coin and save the glove.

My current leaning is to more strongly recommend at least a one-time check to men, especially those who haven't had it before, and that's been a shift in my philosophy over the last few years.

Popular posts from this blog

NSAIDs

Advil and Motrin are ibuprofen, then you have Aleve (naproxen).  Those are the over-the-counter ones.  Prescriptions are Mobic (meloxicam), nabumetone, indomethacin, Toradol (ketorolac), diclofenac, Lodine, and the list goes on.  All of these medications are in a class called non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). I'm giving you this list because there is mounting evidence that these medications a) don't work as well as we'd thought and b) have some very serious long term side effects we're finding out more about. NSAID's act by reducing the amount of prostaglandins you make in order to reduce inflammation.  However, prostaglandins have a ton of other effects and are involved in the maintenance of just about AIDs and also stronger if they are taken every day and/or around-the-clock.  every other organ system that you have.  The effect is stronger with higher doses of NS NSAID's work best and are best indicated for times when something is r...

Kidney Stones

I've written about this previously , but it's often hard to explain to people what a 10 is on the "1-10" pain scale if they haven't been in that spot before.  For women who have had children, they generally know what a 10 is, but for men it's a little harder.  When I was a medical student on my psychiatry rotation, we had a patient calmly sitting there saying his pain level was at a 10 and our resident, who was an ex-military sniper with a large skull tattoo on his forearm and a crosshair through the eye, calmly leaned forward and asked, "so if I lit you on fire and ran you over with my truck, you could not be in more pain than you are now, correct?"  The patient changed his answer. Getting to the point, a kidney stone is about the close I can come to describing a 10/10 pain to people who haven't gone through childbirth.  The fundamental issue is similar - your body is trying to move a big solid thing through an opening that was not really desig...

Pain

Sorry to be a pain I would say about 90% of the comments I hear from people about their pain threshold is that they think they have a high pain tolerance.  Which is statistically impossible unless I just attract people who have a high pain tolerance. We traditionally ask people to rate their pain on a 1-10/10 scale and while we hear a lot of 9's and 10's, I would say that, having been present for a number of them, a 10/10 would be giving birth to a first child.  For those who haven't experienced that, my old psychiatry resident described it as "so if I lit you on fire and ran you over with my truck, you would not be in any more pain than you are now" (he was also a former Marine sniper which might explain that). But this is pretty pervasive throughout the medical system and got me wondering as to how people's understanding of what their pain threshold was matched up to what it really was.  Fortunately, there were researchers who had a yen to poke peopl...